🔗 Share this article

Last Friday, just moments following a federal appeals court decided that the government is required to fully fund Snap food aid disbursements, the administration turned to the supreme court in a new effort to halt the directive.

Within hours, the supreme court issued an emergency order immediately suspending full Snap food aid funds, which close to 42 hundred thousand Americans rely on to put food on the table.

“Legal counsel continue working, around the clock, to defend and advance our agenda,” the top legal officer stated on online platforms shortly after 9:30pm in Washington.

Administration officials had requested the appellate court to stop a court ruling that it distribute November’s complete Snap benefits amid a government funding lapse, and faced refusal that afternoon.

America's Top Court Grants Emergency Order Blocking Full Food Stamp Disbursements

The high court’s order came after the administration asked a national appeals court last Friday to halt a judicial directive mandating they issue this month's entire Snap aid throughout a government funding lapse.

Following that petition to block got rejected, the administration turned to the supreme court in a additional bid to block the ruling to completely finance food stamp disbursements.

What Else Occurred Recently:

• The federal government shutdown dragged consumer sentiment in the US to a historically low level in this month, based on a regular poll administered by the educational institution.

• Students, faculty and staff at over 100 campuses across the US protested the administration’s assault on higher education on Friday – the initial in a scheduled sequence of national, organized demonstrations.

• The New York university revealed a settlement with the government, emerging as the fifth college under investigation by the US government to settle.

• A GOP congresswoman and staunch supporter of the president has publicly started her highly predicted race for state leadership.

• The administration has pardoned a retired athlete on previous tax evasion and substance offenses, citing the athlete's later life adoption of spiritual beliefs and longtime sobriety.